Industry, News, Slideshow

Pershing Study Shows the Adoption of e-Delivery Technologies Still Lagging Despite Client’s Growing Comfort with Email Communication

A new white paper from Pershing entitled, “Closing the e-Delivery Gap: The 2013 e-Delivery Survey,” shows a significant gap between financial executives who expect investors to adopt e-delivery and the actual number of investors who enroll in such services. Using this research, Pershing outlines methods to help financial professionals to increase e-delivery adoption rates despite current challenges and perceptions.

On the positive side, the survey identified numerous reasons for investors wanting e-delivery, including:

  • Easier record keeping (64.3%)
  • Reluctance to pay for paper-based documents (50%)
  • A more secure environment (42.9%)
  • Environmental considerations (21.4%).

While security benefits are a plus for those interested in adopting, security remains a concern among those who are not interested in adopting.

On the negative side of the report, there is a wide gap in perception between what financial advisors believe their clients will do and the actions actually taken. Over 50% of survey respondents expected investors to enroll in at least one type of e-delivery communication, but only about 20% of investors actually chose to adopt those methods.

Obstacles edelivery

The biggest barrier to investor’s adoption of e-delivery, according to this report, is that many investors operate several investment accounts from various firms. Investors are unwilling to master different user interfaces, forms and document delivery processes. Overall, investors struggle with a lack of knowledge of the technology, security concerns, and an unwillingness to change “paper-centric” behaviors.

“Understanding the e-delivery gap boils down to the fact that investors have multiple accounts which are all supported by different technology ecosystems,” said Ram Nagappan, chief information officer of Pershing. “If e-delivery is to be more widely adopted by investors, it’s crucial for firms to embrace integrated technologies so that the industry as a whole can enhance the customer experience for investors. Pershing is continually working with clients on how to engage in the adoption dialogue and offer turnkey solutions to incorporate it into their marketing strategy so that they can educate investors on the benefits of an e-delivery experience.”

Pershing’s white paper outlines efforts that are currently being made to close this gap and encourage the transition from paper delivery to complete e-delivery communications however a broader industry initiative to adopt digital mailbox technology that would allow investors to receive all of their online communications in a single place might have greater impact.

Other key insights include:

  • Five electronic communication mediums were measured in the survey to understand the percentage of respondents who had adopted e-delivery: statements (19.3%), trade confirmations (22.7%), tax documents (21.4%), post-trade prospectuses (25.9%), and proxy annual reports (22.2%). The two lowest-ranking services, statements and tax documents, contain the greatest amount of confidential personal data.
  • The vast majority (70.6%) of respondents identified an e-mail notification with an authenticated link to a website as the most preferred method for providing e-delivery access.  E-mail with document attached but no password required was identified as their least preferred method, with a response rate of 0%.
  • According to participants, custodians use three methods to encourage e-delivery adoption: charging retail investors (58%), charging advisors (33%), and financial incentive to retail investors (42%). Sixty-seven percent of custodians offer no incentives.

closing e-delivery gap

 

To obtain a copy of the white paper, visit the following link.

Data provided by Pershing, a BNY Mellon company. www.bnymellon.com

Elizabeth Gooding

Elizabeth Gooding is the editor of the Insight Forums blog and president of Gooding Communications Group www.GoodComm.net

Twitter LinkedIn 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *